Skip to content
mokk

Messaging and positioning

How do you create messaging that works across different buyer personas who care about fundamentally different things?

Keep one core claim and change the reason it matters for each persona. Interview a few of each, give every persona a proof point in their own terms, and decide which one leads the deal. Then check that sales can move between them without contradicting the story.

Updated · 3 min read

Why interviewers ask it

Multi-persona deals fall apart when each buyer hears a different product. The interviewer wants a method that adapts the message and keeps the story whole.

Interviewers score this one on strategic thinking. The rubric says a Strong answer on strategic thinking defines measurable outcomes and adjusts when results fall short.

How to structure your answer

  1. Interview each persona. Ask what they’d tell their own boss about buying this.
  2. Write one core claim. The single statement all three buyers can accept.
  3. Add a proof point for each. Use the words and metrics that persona already cares about.
  4. Pick who leads. Identify the champion, aim the first touch at them and give them material to forward.
  5. Check the seams with sales. Have reps move between personas and confirm nothing contradicts.

What a strong answer sounds like

Use this to hear the rhythm. Every detail in it is invented.

“I’d keep one story and change the reason it matters. Take a backup product sold to an IT admin, a security lead and a finance approver. The admin cares about restore time, security cares about ransomware recovery and finance cares about the cost of downtime. I’d talk to two or three of each and ask what they would say to their own boss about buying this. Then I’d write a single core claim, that any system can be back in minutes, and give each persona a proof point in their language. Restore drills for the admin, an immutable copy for security and an hours-of-downtime figure for finance. I’d also decide who leads. Here the admin champions the deal, so the first touch speaks to them and the other two get material the admin can forward. Last, I’d check that sales can move between the three without contradicting themselves.”

What a weak answer sounds like

“I would create a separate set of messages for each persona based on their job title and pain points. Each persona gets tailored content in the channels they use, so everyone hears what matters to them.”

The weak answer builds separate messages with no shared core, so the story fragments. Keep one claim, vary the reason it matters, and say which persona leads.

Follow-ups to expect

  • What if two personas want opposite things?
  • How do you research a persona you can’t reach?
  • How many personas is too many?
  • How do you stop sales from inventing their own versions?

Prepare a sentence or two for each. The follow-up questions guide explains how to answer briefly and keep your structure.

More questions in this category

Frequently asked questions

Do I need a persona document?
A short one helps. List each person’s goal, worry and what they need to hear to say yes, and keep it to a page.
Which persona should I favor?
Favor the one who starts and steers the deal, usually the champion. Then give them what they need to persuade the others.

Practice it

Try this question in a live session.

Say your answer aloud and get scored on five competencies, with feedback that quotes what you said. A question costs 1 credit.