Content and campaigns
How do you handle a situation where the sales team is selling the product differently than how you’ve positioned it?
Find out why before you correct anything. Reps usually sell differently because the positioning doesn't survive their conversations, because buyers ask about something else first, or because enablement was unclear.
Listen to calls, ask reps what works, and decide whether you have a sales problem or a positioning problem. Then enable better or change the message, test it with a few reps, and check calls again a month later.
5 min read
Free 10-minute mock
Practice “Sales selling off-message” free
Your first mock interview is free (10 minutes). No card needed.
What off-message selling tells you
When reps drift from the positioning, the drift is information. Reps talk to more buyers in a week than most PMMs do in a quarter, and they are paid to find what works. So the question is less about discipline than diagnosis. Would you treat the gap as reps failing to follow the message, or as evidence about the message?
The strongest answers hold both possibilities open. Sometimes reps are right and the positioning needs to change. Sometimes reps are discounting their way through deals because the value story is hard to tell, and the fix is enablement. What earns the score is showing how you would tell the difference. The strongest versions go one step further and feed what reps learned back into how product describes the market, so the next launch starts closer to what buyers ask.
Who has a stake in the gap, and what moves them
| Stakeholder | What they care about | What moves them |
|---|---|---|
| Reps | Closing this quarter's deals | Evidence that the message wins more deals, shown in their own calls |
| Sales managers | Forecast accuracy and how fast new reps ramp | A message that's easier to coach, with data on win rate or deal size |
| Sales leadership | The number and the team's morale | A clear fix that won't slow deals, and no suggestion their team is failing |
| Product | Differentiation and the roadmap story | Buyer evidence about which value lands, since it can shape priorities |
| Marketing | Consistency across channels | One message that buyers hear the same way in ads and from reps |
A spoken answer from a freight marketplace
“Before correcting anyone, I'd listen to ten calls and ask three reps why they sell it the way they do, with no judgment in the question. There's usually a reason. On a freight marketplace that matches shippers with carriers, our positioning was reliability, loads that show up on time. Reps were leading with price. On the calls the reason was clear. Shippers asked about rates in the first two minutes, and reps who opened with reliability lost them. So the positioning wasn't wrong, it was out of order. I'd test a version with two reps that answers price first, briefly, and then moves to what a late load costs a shipper, like a missed delivery window at a retailer's warehouse. If those two close more deals or hold price better over a month, I'd update the talk track and the positioning document together. If I'd found that reps simply didn't know the reliability story, I'd run a practice session instead. Either way, I'd listen to calls again in a month.”
How off-message answers backfire
“I'd re-share the messaging guide, run a refresher training, and ask sales managers to reinforce it in deal reviews. If it kept happening, I'd raise it with sales leadership.”
Plenty of PMMs would give this answer, and each step is reasonable on its own. It loses points because it assumes the positioning is right and the reps are wrong, without looking at a single call. Reps who get retrained on a message that fails in their conversations stop listening to product marketing entirely. Start with evidence, and say early that the positioning might be what changes.
The opposite failure is giving in too fast. If reps are winning on price by discounting, copying their pitch into the positioning locks in thin margins. Check deal size and discount rates alongside win rate before calling the reps' version better. The sales feedback loop question covers how to keep hearing from the field once the gap is closed.
Follow-ups on off-message selling
| Question | The worry behind it | How to handle it |
|---|---|---|
| What if the reps are right? | Whether you can let go of your own work | Say you would change the positioning, and name how you would test the new version before rolling it out. |
| How do you keep reps from feeling policed? | The relationship | Ask what's working before suggesting anything, and credit reps when their language makes it into the message. |
| Who owns the messaging? | Clarity of roles | Product marketing owns it, and builds it on evidence from the field. |
| One rep refuses to change. | Handling an outlier | Look at their results first. If they're winning, learn from them. If they aren't, it's a conversation for their manager. |
More questions in this category
Frequently asked questions
- Should I escalate off-message selling to sales leadership?
- Yes, after you have gathered evidence and tried to fix it with reps. Bring the call data and a proposed change, and frame it as a shared problem with the message.
- What if reps are winning by selling differently?
- Then learn from it, and check that those deals are healthy on price and retention. A winning pitch that holds margin may be the better positioning.
- How long before I know whether the fix worked?
- A few weeks of calls usually shows whether reps are using the new version. Whether it changes win rate or deal size takes longer, often a quarter, so say which signal you would check first.
Guides that help with this question
All guidesFree 10-minute mock
Practice “Sales selling off-message” free
A Mokk session asks this question, follows up on your answer, and scores it on five competencies. Your first mock is 10 minutes, scored like a full interview. No card needed.
Your first mock interview is free (10 minutes). No card needed.
Practice “Sales selling off-message” free
10 minutes · no card needed