Skip to content
mokk

Market research

Your biggest competitor just pivoted their positioning to directly target your strongest use case. What’s your playbook?

Find out whether the pivot is a new message or a new product before you react. Test their product, listen to buyers for a few weeks, and defend your position with proof if theirs is thin. If it’s solid, narrow toward the part of the use case they can’t reach soon.

Updated · 3 min read

Why interviewers ask it

This tests composure and strategy under pressure. The interviewer wants to see that you diagnose before you respond and that you avoid abandoning a position that still works.

Interviewers score this one on market expertise and strategic thinking. In the rubric, a Strong strategic thinking answer builds plans grounded in market and business context.

How to structure your answer

  1. Diagnose the pivot. Decide whether they changed the message, the product or both.
  2. Test their claim. Run a trial and read release notes to see if the product backs the words.
  3. Listen to buyers. Ask sales what prospects say in the next ten calls.
  4. Choose defend or narrow. Strengthen your proof if theirs is thin, and pick the slice you own if it isn’t.
  5. Set expectations. Tell leadership what may happen to win rate and when you’ll know more.

What a strong answer sounds like

Every name and number here is invented. Your version should use your own.

“I’d slow down for a week before doing anything visible. The first job is finding out whether this is a message or a product. A new homepage costs them a weekend, while a product built for our use case takes a year. Say they now claim to be the fastest way to onboard field teams, which is where we win. I’d run a trial and read their release notes to see if the product backs the words, and I’d ask reps how buyers react over the next ten calls. If the product is thin, I’d sharpen our proof with customer numbers and leave our message alone, since changing it would hand them credit. If it’s solid, I’d find the slice of the use case they can’t reach soon, such as regulated teams, and narrow toward it. I’d also warn leadership that win rate might dip for a quarter.”

What a weak answer sounds like

“I would update our messaging to emphasize why we are better at that use case. I would create new content and a battlecard to help sales, and I would talk to customers to reassure them.”

The weak answer responds with more messaging before checking whether the competitor’s product supports the claim. Diagnose first, then decide whether to defend or narrow.

Follow-ups to expect

  • What if the competitor’s product is good?
  • Would you change your own positioning?
  • How do you reassure existing customers?
  • What would you tell the executive team?

Nobody expects a perfect reply to each one. The follow-up questions guide covers how to stay calm when you run out of prepared material.

More questions in this category

Frequently asked questions

Should I change our messaging right away?
Usually not. A quick reply can weaken a position that still works, so confirm the threat is solid first.
What if the competitor has far more budget?
Focus on the part of the use case where your proof is strongest, since you can’t outspend them everywhere. Say which slice you would choose and why.

Practice it

Answer it out loud.

A Mokk session asks this question and follows up on your answer. A question costs 1 credit and your first credit is free.